<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back Scratcher Revolver</title>
	<link>http://www.slimster.net/back-scratcher-revolver/</link>
	<description>People, Technology, Gardens, Yoga and Corporate America</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: S. Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.slimster.net/back-scratcher-revolver/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.slimster.net/back-scratcher-revolver/#comment-275</guid>
		<description>I always thought a sawed-off shotgun would work better. It is, after all, sawed off. This would seem to provide a more rigid scratching utensil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought a sawed-off shotgun would work better. It is, after all, sawed off. This would seem to provide a more rigid scratching utensil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
